2 Major Statins May Be Equally Effective At Preventing Stroke and Heart Attacks

Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin were similarly effective at preventing death, heart attack, stroke and coronary revascularisation over three years in adults with coronary artery disease. Rosuvastatin lowered LDL cholesterol slightly more, but the trial recorded higher rates of new-onset diabetes requiring medication and cataract surgery. Choosing between them therefore depends on cardiovascular goals, individual risk factors and tolerability.  

2 Major Statins May Be Equally Effective At Preventing Stroke and Heart Attacks
Medically reviewed

Dr. Chrysoula I. Liakou MD, PhD Google Scholar LinkedIn

Internal Medicine Specialist
Cancer Immunology Researcher

What Did the Study Find About Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin?

A recent study has found that two significant statins, namely Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, have an equal efficacy in lowering the risks of heart attacks, strokes, and all-cause deaths.

The study reveals that while Rosuvastatin can reduce cholesterol a bit more than atorvastatin, it also carries a higher risk of developing diabetes and cataracts.

Since only a third of the participants in the study were women, the risks associated with taking these statins for women would need to be studied more in the future.

 

The Study

A new study has found that Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin are both equally effective at lowering the risk of strokes, heart attacks, and mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. While the two drugs are similarly effective, they do possess a couple of key differences.


Taking Rosuvastatin can result in a more marked decrease in cholesterol levels, but it is associated with an elevated chance of developing diabetes and cataracts.


Many people with coronary heart disease may benefit from taking Rosuvastatin, as it can help to reduce their levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, which is considered to be the "bad" type of cholesterol.


Individuals who are prone to developing diabetes may be better off taking atorvastatin instead of other medications.


Researchers looked at 4,400 individuals who were involved in a clinical trial at 12 medical centres in South Korea. Participants were split into two groups and given Rosuvastatin or atorvastatin between September 2016 and November 2019. When the trial was finished, 4,341 individuals remained in the study.


The mean age of participants was 65, with a standard deviation of 10 years, and 27.9% were women.

 

Comparing Rosuvastatin And Atorvastatin


Researchers were interested in analysing the effects of two different statins on the primary outcomes of heart attack, stroke, all-cause death, and the need for coronary revascularization. This procedure helps restore blood flow to a particular area of the heart. The results showed that the statins had similar effects on all these outcomes.


In the rosuvastatin group, 1.5% experienced heart attacks and 2.6% experienced all-cause deaths. Similarly, the atorvastatin group had 1.2% of heart attacks and 2.3% of all-cause deaths. Moreover, 1.1% and 0.9% of the groups, respectively, experienced strokes, and 5.3% and 5.2% of the groups needed coronary revascularization.


The authors conducted the study to assess safety, tracking any incidences of diabetes, heart failure leading to hospital admission, pulmonary thromboembolism or vein thrombosis, endovascular revascularisation due to peripheral artery disease, surgical aortic intervention, end-stage kidney disease, any discontinuation of either drug due to intolerance, cataract surgeries, and any combination of abnormal lab values.


People taking Rosuvastatin had a higher rate of type 2 diabetes, at 7.2%, compared to those taking atorvastatin, which was 5.3%. Additionally, the rosuvastatin group had a higher rate of requiring cataract surgery, 2.5%, than the atorvastatin group, which was 1.5%.  


The study's senior investigator noted that although there were slight variations between the two statins concerning diabetes and cataracts, these differences were statistically significant.


A cardiologist who was not involved in the study mentioned that when considering a patient's medical profile and risk reduction strategies, these differences between the statins might play a role.


The study's findings regarding an increase in diabetes with one statin and an increase in cataract surgeries were not entirely unexpected, as earlier research had observed similar trends.


On a positive note, the group taking one of the statins had lower LDL cholesterol levels than the other group.


It's important to interpret these study findings carefully. The research does not endorse one specific type of statin over the other. Instead, it highlights that each statin has distinct strengths and weaknesses in lowering LDL cholesterol, potentially causing new-onset diabetes, and affecting cataracts.

 

How Do Statins Work?


Statins, originally derived from fungi, are commonly prescribed to lower cholesterol levels and reduce the risk of coronary heart disease.


In comparison to North America, which had the highest utilisation of statins in 2020 at 279.7 DDDs/TPD, Europe was not far behind with 159.9 DDDs/TPD. Latin America, MENA, East Asia, South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa had much lower utilisation rates of 66.1, 64.1, 29.3, 16.1 and 24.7 DDD/TPD, respectively.


Statins work by reducing the accumulation of atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries, decreasing the risk of heart attacks by preventing blockages in critical arteries that supply oxygen to the heart.


Although the exact mechanism of how statins maintain artery health is not fully understood, a 2023 study may provide answers. This research suggests that statins prevent a protein called YAP from loosening tightly bundled DNA, known as chromatin, in the endothelial cells lining blood vessels. This prevents changes in gene expression that would otherwise cause these cells to transform into less flexible and functional mesenchymal cells.

 


Diabetes itself can bring about structural changes in the eye's lens, potentially leading to cataracts. This occurs due to prolonged exposure of the eyes to elevated blood glucose levels.


Diabetic retinopathy, a known complication of diabetes, can even lead to blindness. While cataracts are a common part of ageing, individuals with diabetes often experience accelerated development of cataracts at a younger age, resulting in the accumulation of deposits on the eye's lens.


Our study underscores the importance of careful monitoring and adopting appropriate lifestyle measures to reduce the risk of developing new-onset diabetes or cataracts in individuals with coronary artery disease when considering Rosuvastatin instead of atorvastatin.

 

Statins' Effects On Menopause Are Unclear.


There are several limitations in the study worth considering. Firstly, it focused solely on East Asian individuals from Korea, lacking representation from other racial groups. Additionally, the study's participant demographics, particularly the ages of female participants, remain unclear.


It's important to note that high lipid levels are a recognised risk factor for heart disease, which is the leading cause of death among women globally. Dyslipidemia tends to increase as women age, with significant changes occurring during menopause, often linked to decreased estrogen levels that impact lipid profiles.


Furthermore, the study did not track osteoporosis in menopausal women. Cholesterol-lowering medications, including statins, may have varying effects on the risk of osteoporosis in menopausal women, depending on the dosage used.


For expert consultations and guidance on various health concerns, including those related to cholesterol management and medication, you can consult with Mobi Doctor. Their healthcare professionals are available to provide personalised advice and support.



Rosuvastatin vs Atorvastatin for Heart Attack and Stroke Prevention FAQs

The study compared the long-term effectiveness and safety of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in 4,400 adults with coronary artery disease. Participants from 12 South Korean hospitals were randomly assigned to one of the two statins and followed for three years. Researchers tracked deaths, heart attacks, strokes, coronary procedures and several potential safety outcomes.

Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin produced comparable cardiovascular outcomes over three years. The primary outcome occurred in 8.7% of the rosuvastatin group and 8.2% of the atorvastatin group, with no statistically significant difference. This supports similar effectiveness in the population studied, but it does not prove that the medicines perform identically for every patient or over longer periods.

Rosuvastatin lowered LDL cholesterol slightly more than atorvastatin in this trial. Average LDL levels during treatment were approximately 1.8 mmol/L with rosuvastatin and 1.9 mmol/L with atorvastatin. However, the additional LDL reduction did not produce a significantly lower rate of death, heart attack, stroke or coronary revascularisation during the three-year follow-up.

Rosuvastatin was associated with higher rates of two safety outcomes. New-onset diabetes requiring medication occurred in 7.2% of participants receiving rosuvastatin and 5.3% receiving atorvastatin, while cataract surgery occurred in 2.5% and 1.5%, respectively. Other assessed safety outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups.

The trial found higher rates of diabetes requiring medication and cataract surgery among people assigned rosuvastatin, but it does not mean every person taking rosuvastatin will develop either condition. The findings indicate a possible difference in risk that should be weighed against cholesterol-lowering benefits, existing diabetes risk, eye health and other individual clinical factors.

Doctors consider the LDL reduction required, cardiovascular history, diabetes risk, kidney and liver health, other medicines, previous statin side effects and treatment response. Both drugs are potent statins, but their doses, interactions and suitability differ. Follow-up cholesterol tests and assessment of tolerability help determine whether the selected medicine and dose are appropriate.

Do not stop or switch atorvastatin or rosuvastatin without speaking to the clinician managing your treatment. The study found comparable cardiovascular protection, and the most suitable option depends on personal risk factors rather than one result alone. A medication review can consider LDL levels, blood glucose, side effects, interactions and whether the current statin is meeting its treatment goal.

The findings may not apply equally to every population. The trial was open-label, included participants from South Korea, enrolled substantially fewer women than men and followed patients for three years. It was also a secondary analysis of the LODESTAR trial. Longer and more diverse studies are needed to clarify whether the safety differences persist across other populations and treatment durations.


Comments

Submit


Swipe up to see a Dr.

close